5 people sitting around a desk with 2 books open

Firm Blog

information on firm news, case law,

FAQ & more

Let's Talk

When legal challenges present themselves, they can have a tremendous impact on your life. Tell us what happened to find out what your case is worth and see how we can help.

The consultation is free!

Find out what your case is worth

Comparative Negligence: What Injury Victims in New Jersey Need to Know

Comparative Negligence: What Injury Victims in New Jersey Need to Know

Introduction to Comparative Negligence in New Jersey

Accidents often lead to a whirlwind of questions, concerns, and potential legal actions. If you’ve been involved in an accident in New Jersey, you’ve likely encountered the term ‘comparative negligence.’ At Lombardi & Lombardi, we prioritize providing clarity and information. This article will delve into the concept of comparative negligence and its implications for your personal injury claim in the Garden State.

Understanding Comparative Negligence

The Basics of Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is a legal doctrine applied to assign fault in personal injury cases. It moves away from the binary approach of one party being entirely at fault and instead assesses the situation to determine each party’s degree of responsibility.

  • Holistic Approach: The law considers all aspects of the incident to ascertain the fault percentage of each involved party.
  • Shared Fault: It recognizes that multiple parties may share responsibility for an accident, affecting the compensation accordingly.

New Jersey’s Modified Comparative Negligence Rule

New Jersey adheres to a “modified comparative negligence” system, which has specific characteristics:

  • Fault Percentage: Courts assess the fault of each party, assigning a percentage to all involved.
  • Reduction in Damages: Compensation is reduced by your fault percentage. For example, 30% fault means you can recover 70% of the damages.
  • 50% Threshold: Recovery is barred if you are more than 50% responsible for the accident.

The Importance of Comparative Negligence for New Jersey Drivers

Navigating the roads of New Jersey comes with its own set of challenges and risks. As a driver, passenger, or pedestrian in the Garden State, it’s essential to understand the doctrine of comparative negligence, as it plays a pivotal role in personal injury claims arising from vehicular accidents. This knowledge not only informs you of your legal standing post-accident but also prepares you for the intricacies of potential litigation and insurance claims. Let’s explore why grasping the concept of comparative negligence is a crucial component of your rights and responsibilities on New Jersey roads.

  • Awareness of Rights: It empowers victims to pursue compensation even when partially at fault.
  • Insurance Negotiations: Knowledge of these rules is crucial when dealing with insurance companies that may argue for a higher fault percentage to minimize payout.
  • Legal Strategy: A clear understanding can influence your legal strategy, ensuring fault is fairly assessed.

The doctrine of comparative negligence is more than just a legal concept; it’s a critical element of New Jersey’s traffic and insurance law that can have a profound impact on the outcome of accident-related claims. For drivers, awareness and understanding of this rule are as essential as knowing the traffic laws themselves. Whether you’re dealing with insurance adjusters or pursuing legal action, a solid grasp of comparative negligence can be the key to safeguarding your interests. Remember, knowledge is power, especially when it comes to navigating the complexities of personal injury cases in New Jersey.

Practical Examples of Comparative Negligence in Action

To better understand how comparative negligence might play out, let’s consider some hypothetical scenarios:

  • The Grocery Store Slip: Imagine Mary is shopping and, while distracted by her phone, slips on a spill that wasn’t marked with a sign. In a hypothetical lawsuit, if found 30% at fault for her distraction, Mary could potentially recover 70% of her damages from the store.
  • The Highway Collision: John decides to change lanes without signaling and collides with Peter, who was speeding. If a court hypothetically found John 40% at fault and Peter 60%, John could be entitled to recover 60% of his damages from Peter.
  • The Distracted Pedestrian: Lisa, absorbed in her phone, starts to cross the street against the light and is struck by Sam, who was driving slightly over the speed limit. If both were deemed equally at fault, Lisa might recover 50% of her damages in a hypothetical claim.
  • The Dog Bite Incident: In a hypothetical scenario, Tim tries to pet Rachel’s dog without permission and is bitten. If found 60% at fault for not seeking consent, Tim would not be able to recover damages from Rachel under New Jersey’s modified comparative negligence rule.
  • The Damaged Bike Lane: Sara is cycling in a bike lane that is poorly maintained by the city and crashes. If she wasn’t wearing protective gear, a court might find her 30% at fault. In this hypothetical case, Sara could be awarded 70% of her damages from the city.

These examples are designed to illustrate how New Jersey’s comparative negligence law could apply in various situations. They highlight the critical aspect of understanding how fault is divided and the impact this division has on the compensation one might receive. Legal advice from professionals who are well-versed in these matters is always recommended for actual cases.

Seeking Legal Assistance

Comparative negligence is a complex principle with significant implications for personal injury claims, especially auto accidents. Knowing your rights and responsibilities is essential.

If you’re involved in an accident and comparative negligence is a factor, consulting with seasoned legal professionals is crucial. At Lombardi & Lombardi, we have extensive experience with New Jersey’s negligence laws and are committed to guiding you towards a favorable outcome. Contact us today for a comprehensive consultation.

Contact an Experienced Personal Injury Lawyer at Lombardi & Lombardi for a Free Consultation About Your Case Today

Comparative negligence in New Jersey is a nuanced principle that requires a clear understanding, especially when it comes to auto accident claims. Knowing your rights and responsibilities as a driver is essential.

If you’ve been involved in an accident in New Jersey and believe that comparative negligence may be a factor in your case, it’s crucial to consult with experienced legal professionals. At Lombardi & Lombardi, we have years of experience navigating the complexities of New Jersey’s negligence laws and are here to help. Don’t navigate these tricky waters alone; let us guide you to the best possible outcome. Contact Lombardi & Lombardi today for a consultation.



Lead Counsel in the Durham Woods Gas Pipeline Explosion



Severe head injury due to a motor vehicle accident



Medical malpractice resulting in spinal cord injury

Super Lawyers National Trial Lawyers Top 100 NJ Supreme Court Certified NJ Supreme Court Certified